It is clear Chinese companies have ‘the pole position’ and as a result represent both a global economic and national security threat.
In a report by IPlytics’ research on patent analytics they provide: China leading patents required by the 5G rollout. The Chinese 5G market accounts for 34% of all 5G patents and technology (15% of which is owned by Huawei (Huawei Canada )(tech arm of the Chinese government) and another 11.7% by ZTE Corp. (OTCMKTS: ZTCOY – Bing)).
South Korea accounts for 25% (Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. for 13%); trailing- European Union and the United States with 14% each of market.
‘So what’ you might be inclined to say- –think about– with speeds as much as 100 times faster than 4G networks military capabilities in space, hypersonic and explosive ‘stickiness’ of the Internet of Things of this new industrial age and the disruption and turbulence brought every business sector this is the key terrain– this is the high ground– who commands 5G wins the economic ‘race’.
And the race is well underway… So this article caught my eye… As I recall the demise of Canada’s jewel in the crown….Blackberry—and its relationship with the Chinese and’s patents (BlackBerry uncovers China-backed hacking campaign | CTV News)… Canada must stand on guard… Have a look…
July 26, 2021
Morning Update: CSIS urges universities to be vigilant in watching out for foreign espionage (Morning Update: CSIS urges universities to be vigilant in watching out for foreign espionage – The Globe and Mail)
CSIS has met with more than 230 Canadian research and industry groups and briefed more than 2,000 individuals, as part of an effort that started in April, 2020, to warn universities and researchers that they could be vulnerable to international espionage.
Documents obtained by The Globe show that CSIS prepared presentations for groups such as Universities Canada, biopharma labs and agencies involved in critical aspects of the supply chain, with the aim of sounding the alarm about potential threats to Canadian research.
It was part of a broader attempt to influence an academic mindset that has long prized openness and international collaboration, while in CSIS’s view, not paying enough attention to the implications for national security.
